DG (i)2101 Interneuron-Specific Collateral-Targeting (IS COLTAR) cells [1104]
Related types:
|
DG (i)2313p-CA3_03000-CA1_2000 IS-3 projection (v1.0 on-hold)
|
|
DG (i)2303 non-FS interneuron (v1.0 on-hold)
|
Notes: This type has no dendrites in DG:SMi_H, which distinguishes it from the v1.0 neuron types. This type does not project into CA3, which distinguishes it from the other IS projection type. These cells are VIP+ and are speculated by the authors to be interneuron specific.
VIP+. Ephys. FP. Lengths.
After reviewing DG (i)2101p IS COLTAR Proj [#1104], I am unsure where the evidence of projection to CA1 SLM for this neuron type is coming from. Is this an inference made based off evidence from the on-hold IS-3 projection neuron type? Otherwise I am not seeing any textual evidence or evidence from the provided figures to support this conclusion (Figure 3b from the provided packet does not support a projection to CA1 based on somata locations relative to CA1 in our reference van Strien figure). - JDK 11/22/2021
|
When I look at the possible somata locations for each of the four Bis neurons as shown in 3b I donā??t think any of them would be positioned to extend into CA1 SLM. - JDK 11/23/2021
|
|
It is hard to judge based on no information from the authors, but they definitely project outside of the DG.
|
|
You would picture them projecting more into the subiculum or the presubiculum? - DWW 11/23/2021
|
|
I concur they definitely project outside of DG. And ahh I see, noted on what you had in mind.
|
|
Yes I could see them projecting to either subiculum SM or presubiculum based on the somata locations provided by the reference. - JDK 11/23/2021
|
|
After taking a closer look at the somata location provided by the authors and comparing their schematic to Figure 1C of van Strien et al., 2009, I think we have been too conservative in our assessment of the somata locations. I now think they are more parallel to the presubiculum and parasubiculum than to the subiculum. - DWW 11/30/2021
|
|
I can see this being the case. With that said, should we just not include that it projects? This would constitute a new neuron type just from its A-D pattern in DG. - JDK 11/30/2021
|
|
I agree that we should still include this as a new neuron type. I will add comments that the dendrites project outside of the entire hippocampal formation and, therefore, will not be considered in the A-D pattern. - DWW 12/01/2021
|
|
I agree with the proposed solution. - JDK 12/02/2021
|
|
I approve. Only requested change, remove the p-CA1_2000 appendix from the formal name on page 1 of the packet in light of the notes thereafter. - GAA 01/25/2022
|
|