|
DG [3313] TML cells
DWW
|
Check out Mott et al. paper (D. A. Turner's group) - GAA
|
DG TML 3302 cells
DWW
This document contains information on:
|
DG total molecular layer 3303 neurons
|
|
DG total molecular layer 3302 neurons
|
I am interpreting 2 separate classes. Bartos curiously does not cite Mott, which is one clue that these may be different classes. In Mott, it is unclear from the wording how typical/atypical the presence of axons in the hilus is.
opinions? - DWW
|
I agree that the n numbers in Mott aren't clear. The 11 with an axon in hilus are enough for a class, which seems to be distinct from the 'typical' cells shown in Figure 2. I'm OK with two classes. - CLR 02/26/2011
|
|
I agree - 2 classes - CW 03/08/2011
|
DG MOLAX 3302 cell
I propose merging this class with DG 3302 TML cells. - DWW
Paperclipped together are the two classes DG MOLAX 3302 cells, which is a new class, and DG 3302 TML cells, which has already been fully approved.
If the DG MOLAX 3302 class receives full approval, then it is proposed that we merge these two classes.
AOK I assume we're also keeping TML 3303? - GAA
Paperclipped together are a previous cover sheet and the two classes
|
DG MOLAX 3302 cells (fully approved)
|
|
DG TML 3302 cells (fully approved)
|
1) Do you approve of merging these two cell classes?
Yes. - DWW, CW, CLR
2) Assuming merger, what unified class name do you prefer?
|
TML: total molecular layer?
|
DWW, CW, CLR
|
I'm OK with merger. MOLAX part of packet (Soriano/Frotscher) needs to get cleaned. Is the MOLAX name theirs? If not, I'm fine with TML. In general, name proposals should be accompanied by a specification as to their provenance. - GAA
|
DG (i)3302 MOLAX cells [1005]
After reviewing the provided [DG (i)3002 MOHIPP] packet, I concur with the interpretations and approve of this neuron type for v2.0. - JDK 10/13/2021
|
I'm not convinced. I would probably consider writing off these [DG (i)3002 MOHIPP] cells as Outer Molecular Layer (3222) or MOLAX (3302) neurons?! Happy to re-discuss though ... - GAA 01/19/2022
|
|
I think the OML interpretation has its merits, more so than the MOLAX interpretation. - DWW 01/21/2022
|
|
I'd say I still favor the 3002 interpretation based on the low axonal and dendritic presence within SMi, but can also see interpreting the A-D pattern as MOLAX (3302) as the axonal and dendritic presence within SMi is around the ~15% threshold and there is a fair amount of branching. The OML interpretation I favor less than the MOLAX or MOHIPP interpretation as the dendritic presence within SG is far below the 15% threshold and there is minimal branching in the provided reconstruction. - JDK 01/21/2022
|
|
Based on comparisons with the established v1.0 neuron types, I now posit that the blue MOHIPP cell [Fig. 4c from Lee et al., 2016] is a 3222 OML, and the brown MOHIPP cell [Fig. S2d from Lee et al., 2016] is a 3302 MOLAX. - DWW 01/22/2022
|
|
I concur. - GAA 01/22/2022
|
|
I am also in agreement. - JDK 01/22/2022
|
Supplement notes:
|
Related types:
|
DG (i)3303 Total Molecular Layer (v1.0 active)
|
Firing pattern.
DWW 05/23/2023
I concur with the 3302 AD pattern. - JDK 05/23/2023
|
approved. - GAA 05/24/2023
|
|
Browse
Search
Help
